A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning prospective neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal web page in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted countrywide attention adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier and the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic in the depth of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the authorized timeline.
For the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and problems connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by issue for environmental defense and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it is about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their lengthy-standing relationship to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few just attempting to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waistline-significant water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Special Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and planning conditions. However the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living together with each other prolonged following the legal costs have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building functions at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Paul Feely Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.